Cricket’s a fitness instructor and a witch. So it’s not harassment, it’s professional appraisal.
Here we’re touching on some of the reasons behind Max’s “Deadvision” and why he can’t summon Sophie anytime he feels like shutting down his own circulatory system. There’s rules, and they’re probably compounded by Sophie’s own pride. Spirits can be stubborn. I doubt Letoa would have much luck if she tried to boss Manaia around either.
And more below!
Bobservations
Smoke ‘Em If You Got ‘Em
For a fitness instructor, Cricket sure smokes like a chimney. Not all that unusual, I gather. Everyone has their vices, and one gets the impression that Cricket’s as fond of the style and mood of smoking as she is of the actual nicotine. I confess that as a Writer-Type Person I’ve made numerous attempts to take up smoking (in the form of either a pipe or cigars) simply because it seemed like part of the persona. Didn’t work; I never could get the hang of a pipe, and my six-month experiment with Backwoods Smokes (in the pathetic belief that they’d make me look like Clint Eastwood and write like Twain) resulted in my developing a lip carcinoma that had to be surgically removed. Enough of that. Fortunately, for whatever reason, I never actually got hooked. So the cigars were discarded and the pipe (a hand-carved antique meerschaum originally belonging to my great-uncle) was returned to the shelf of family mementos. Just a natural non-smoker, I guess.
However, I did shoot some smoke for this particular page. As with most things, it wasn’t required, Max-The-Artist being more than capable of painting smoke without my help, but hey, I have to have some fun.
I’d done smoke footage once before (many years ago) at the request of a client. Found it quite unpleasant at the time because I was forced to smoke actual cigarettes. Menthol Kools, to be specific, since that was the only brand I could remember. (They’d been mentioned in Pitch Black.) But the footage worked out well. It had been shot during the DV era though, and was no longer of a usable resolution for our purposes.
Blessedly, this time was much easier because e-cigs have since been invented, and it turns out they even have flavored juice without nicotine (for people who are quitting.) The narrow wisp effect was just a stick of incense; and the match was… a match. Pie. Max-The-Artist always enhances hell out of them with highlights and shadows, of course (as in Panel One.) There’s a lot more to selling an effect than just the effect.
But I also thought you might like to see the rough I was working from. This is what Max-The-Artist bangs out during our sessions, and it always amazes me how much implied detail he gets into just a few strokes of a digital pencil. I was giving him a lot of leeway; my main concern was making sure that a page which was mostly dialogue nonetheless had sufficient acting and expression to retain audience interest. Max and Cricket are still sparring, bargaining for information, and that kind of subtle back-and-forth fishing and prodding can be tricky to sell. When he sent over this initial rough I was quite pleased. I had to fit in a number of balloons, and of course the smoke, but hell, that’s the easy part.
Even as a rough page, I considered it practically worthy of a life-drawing class. Of course, I’m somewhat biased.
Also, Cricket’s shredded abs got sacrificed by the page crop; but here’s a look at the uncropped version.
Smokin’!
— Bob out
Half a tic………..
i thought Cricket played for the “other” team?
Oh, she does. She’s just being brassy, not flirting.
Why would anyone except Bob automatically assume Cricket wasn’t/isn’t bi? (Since he actually knows). It’s rather a common choice; Cricket might play perfectly well on both teams. Always dangerous to assume a preference is a hard stop; for many people sexual preferences are fluid.
In other news, Sophie’s presence now explains why Max isn’t a demonic monster, which had been eating at me since early days. Assuming the danger of otherworldly possession is a real issue with the design, the strike gate is even more dangerous than it seems; the set of possible users may be limited to a VERY very tiny group of people who can die at will AND have spiritual protectors. In most cases the people capable of doing these sorts of things would be yogis, martial arts masters, or deeply spiritual people.
Suddenly I am imagining: a) a Vatican/Swiss guard branch of the strike gate, b) the New Delhi yogi bureau, and c) the Hong Kong Kung Fu bureau, each with their own very unique skill set and way of meeting the gate requirements.
At any given time there might be only two or three people in the world able to safely utilize the gate, and the odds of them being a good fit both tactically and strategically could easily be smaller yet.
If by “common” you mean hardly unheard of among the 2-2.5% of the male population and 1-1.5% of the female population that is gay, then sure … it’s common.
It isn’t common. We’re social beasts and that causes all kinds of issues, especially in hunter-gatherer, nomadic, or sedentary agricultural societies. It works better for roving sailors, I suppose.
I’m going to assume that despite your tone you were not trolling the comments and haven’t looked past the obvious statistics. A good Biostatistics class can be an eye opener.
A significant distinction can be made between what statisticians call ‘incidence’ and ‘prevalence’ when you ask people about sensitive issues like people’s sexual orientation.
People are very, very selective when asked to describe issues like their sex lives, and they typically report the majority of their choices as if it was the totality. There are a lot of reasons for this, but the rest of us call this ‘lying by omission’.
The 2013 NHIS data collected in 2013 from 34,557 adults is typical. 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as “something else”
That is their majority sexual OPINION. When random groups of that pool are then sat down and pressed about their TOTAL life experiences, they report a much wider group of sexual experiences more closely in line with Kinsey.
Kinsey reported that 37% of men in the U.S. had achieved orgasm through contact with another male _after_adolescence_ and 13% of women had achieved orgasm through contact with another woman _after_adolescence_, yet the vast majority of those individuals reported themselves as Hetero. These are adults, not children, choosing to have sex with other adults. “Experimentation” doesn’t really cover this.
Modern statistics show the numbers of women with such experiences increasing by about 20% over the last 40 years, which brings them more in line with the men.
Even homosexual individuals tend to dismiss and under report their alternative sexual experiences. Ie, lie about it. They have chosen a narrative, and they ignore the parts that do not fit.
So much for the common wisdom of rarity; bisexual activity appears to be pretty damn common statistically even if it only happens with a few selected others a few selective times.
37% + 13(or 33)% is not insignificant; it’s just very uncomfortable for many people to discuss. They have framed the narrative of their life in a certain way (“I’m gay” “I’m straight”) and they selectively choose to not address events in their own lives that do not line up with that narrative. They lie to themselves even as the facts in their lives tell a very different story.
The real truth is that most people are simply much more attracted to one sex than the other, but for a significant, very large percentage of us there are exceptions, and sex happens. You can try to ignore or downplay this fact as so many do, but it’s still going on out there in the real world.
First!
Be glad you never got hooked, Bob. I’ve watched way too many people struggle with nicotine addiction, and been a pall bearer for too many people younger than me.
You play with explosives. That’s much more macho than handing Death a blank check.
“When they call you ‘Big Boy’, they’re not exaggerating!”
So when can we get a Votey of Cricket in all her “shredded abs” glory?
Funny you should mention that. Guess what Max-The-Artist just sent over. Give me a few minutes to
get it up.post it.That rough is gorgeous, Max!
Thanks Joe!
I know we wouldn’t get along very well most likely, but I have to say, Cricket isn’t just easy on the eyes, she’s also highly entertaining in her own way. I’m glad we get to see Max go through the trouble to introduce us to her! 😀
P.S. She’s no Marissa (who could be?), but Cricket is definitely pin-up worthy. Nicely done, Max!
Personally I am more suprised he’d let a woman that has tried to kill/hurt him now Twice paw him at all, yeah he can handle himself sure but that hardly changes that there’s very little reason to assume that after attempt two failed she hasnt just chosen to get subtle and more patient for strike three. I doubt this is where they are going with the story of course, but he’s being awfully casual about letting her all over his personal space given their immediate history.
Thanks for the update (and the photo), Bob! Rest assured that I’ll continue to check-in periodically (usually weekly) to see the finished result. 🙂